Binanceexchange
StableLegal

Manhattan US Attorney Office leads probe into Binance's Iran sanctions compliance

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether Binance knowingly allowed Iran-linked trading that violated US sanctions, Bloomberg reported, with the DOJ Criminal Division also involved.

Read this event in español

Why it matters

The investigation adds to Binance's existing legal exposure: its 2023 settlement covered only the conduct in its Statement of Facts and, TheNewsCrypto noted, does not protect the exchange against prosecution for other conduct. Bitcoin Insider reported that sanctions cases handled through US Attorney's offices can carry significant financial penalties and, in some instances, personal liability for executives.

Where the sources disagree

Whether the reporting describes a fresh probe or new detail on an earlier one

a fresh US DOJ investigation

CoinGape

new details about an existing Justice Department investigation first reported in March

Cointelegraph

CoinGape frames the story as a fresh US DOJ investigation, while Cointelegraph says the Bloomberg report provides new details about a Justice Department investigation first reported in March.

Key facts

The Manhattan US Attorney's Office is leading an investigation into whether Binance knowingly allowed trading that violated US sanctions on Iran.

Reported by Cointelegraph

The Justice Department's Criminal Division in Washington is also involved in the investigation.

Reported by Cointelegraph

Bloomberg reported the probe on September 22, citing people familiar with the matter.

Reported by Cointelegraph

Binance said it has a zero-tolerance policy for sanctions violations, fully cooperates with law enforcement and is 'committed to rooting out and shutting down bad actors.'

Reported by Cointelegraph

The specific transactions under scrutiny have not been publicly identified.

Reported by TheNewsCrypto

In March, the Wall Street Journal reported that the DOJ was examining whether Iran used Binance to evade sanctions, and Binance said at the time it was not aware of any DOJ investigation.

Reported by Cointelegraph

Binance's 2023 settlement covered IEEPA sanctions violations tied to roughly $898 million in US-Iran trades between 2018 and May 2022, cost $4.3 billion and imposed a three-year compliance monitor.

4,300,000,000 USDReported by TheNewsCrypto

Last week the DOJ said it was seizing and seeking to forfeit about $61 million in cryptocurrency that it alleges came from the black-market sale of sanctioned Iranian oil laundered through Binance by Chinese entities.

61,000,000 USDReported by Crypto News (CryptoNews.net)

What happened

Bloomberg reported on September 22, citing people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified, that the Manhattan US Attorney's Office is investigating whether Binance knowingly allowed trading that violated US sanctions on Iran, with the Justice Department's Criminal Division in Washington also involved. Cointelegraph, CoinGape, CoinDesk, Protos and Bitcoin Magazine carried the report. The specific transactions under scrutiny have not been publicly identified, and Cointelegraph noted that an investigation does not establish wrongdoing and may conclude without charges. Binance said it maintains a zero-tolerance policy for sanctions violations, cooperates fully with law enforcement and is 'committed to rooting out and shutting down bad actors.' CoinGape reported that co-CEO Richard Teng publicly distanced the exchange from a related civil forfeiture case in the days before, and Bitcoin Insider said Teng reportedly pushed back against the allegations without detailing his rebuttal. The probe adds detail to a Justice Department investigation that the Wall Street Journal first reported in March, when Binance told Cointelegraph it was not aware of any DOJ investigation.

How the story developed

  1. First report

    First report by Cointelegraph

    Manhattan US Attorney leading probe into Binance’s Iran compliance: Bloomberg

    Cointelegraph

  2. Update

    Wall Street Journal reports DOJ examining whether Iran used Binance to evade sanctions

    Binance said at that time it was not aware of any DOJ investigation.

    Cointelegraph

  3. Official statement

    Binance says it has a zero-tolerance policy for sanctions violations

    The statement did not directly address whether Binance is aware of the reported investigation.

    Cointelegraph

  4. Update

    Bloomberg reports the Manhattan US Attorney's Office leads the investigation

    The Justice Department's Criminal Division in Washington is also involved.

    Cointelegraph

  5. Independent corroboration

    Independently corroborated by CoinGape

    Binance Under Fresh US DOJ Probe for Iran Sanctions After Richard Teng Pushes Back

    CoinGape

  6. Update

    DOJ moves to seize about $61 million in cryptocurrency allegedly linked to sanctioned Iranian oil sales

    The DOJ alleged the proceeds were laundered through Binance accounts.

    Crypto News (CryptoNews.net)

  7. Update

    Binance sues Wall Street Journal for defamation over the Iran reporting

    Protos

  8. Update

    CoinGape, CoinDesk, Protos and Bitcoin Magazine publish independent coverage of the Bloomberg report

    CoinGape

How coverage built up

Independent sources over time, counted the way the consensus panel counts them: a republication of a wire story does not move the line.

22 Sept, 02:227 independent sources22 Sept, 16:52
  • 22 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC: Cointelegraph — 1 independent source, 1 reports
  • 22 Sept 2026, 06:35 UTC: CoinGape — 2 independent sources, 2 reports
  • 22 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC: Bitcoin Insider — 3 independent sources, 3 reports
  • 22 Sept 2026, 06:41 UTC: TheNewsCrypto — 4 independent sources, 4 reports
  • 22 Sept 2026, 10:07 UTC: CoinDesk — 5 independent sources, 5 reports
  • 22 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC: Protos — 6 independent sources, 7 reports
  • 22 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC: Bitcoin Magazine — 7 independent sources, 8 reports

Affected entities

Also mentioned: Changpeng Zhao, Donald Trump, United Arab Emirates, U.S. Congress, Russia

Original sources