Visa data refresh cuts adjusted stablecoin volume; transaction count slips under 2%
CryptoSlate reports Visa's Sept. 18 refresh cut its adjusted stablecoin volume measure as labeled addresses grew from about 15 million to roughly 600 million.
Why it matters
Visa's adjusted volume series is not comparable across the September 18 boundary, so the lower figure reflects a change in how transfers are classified rather than a documented fall in stablecoin payments. Payment-category trends and chain rankings stay unresolved until Visa supplies before-and-after dollar totals.
Where the sources disagree
Number of labeled addresses in Visa's stablecoin dataset
roughly 600 million labeled addresses (Sept. 18 changelog full identity set)
CryptoSlate
over 3 million labeled addresses (live transaction methodology)
CryptoSlate
The dated changelog describes a full identity set of roughly 600 million labeled addresses while Visa's live transaction methodology text still says over 3 million.
Key facts
Visa's September 18 data refresh lowered its adjusted stablecoin transfer value measure.
Reported by CryptoSlate
The underlying Allium identity set used by Visa grew from about 15 million labeled addresses to roughly 600 million.
600,000,000 addressesDisputed figureReported by CryptoSlate
Visa's adjusted transaction count fell by less than 2%.
2 %Reported by CryptoSlate
Visa says the definition of adjusted volume stayed the same, continuing to exclude labeled exchanges, contracts, bots, bridges, other infrastructure, and minting and burning.
Reported by CryptoSlate
The refresh added heuristics for short-term routing and changed how organic and payment activity is identified.
Reported by CryptoSlate
Visa did not publish comparable before-and-after dollar totals or payment-category data.
Reported by CryptoSlate
Visa's live transaction methodology still describes more than 3 million labeled addresses.
3,000,000 addressesDisputed figureReported by CryptoSlate
Excluding high-value routing can move dollar volume more than it moves the transaction count.
Reported by CryptoSlate
What happened
CryptoSlate reported that Visa's September 18 data refresh lowered its adjusted stablecoin transfer value while the adjusted transaction count fell by less than 2%. Visa's Onchain Analytics changelog attributes the reset to a fuller set of address labels and revised filters, with the underlying Allium identity set growing from about 15 million labeled addresses to roughly 600 million. Visa says the definition of adjusted volume stayed the same, still aiming to exclude labeled exchanges, contracts, bots, bridges, other infrastructure, and minting and burning, so with more addresses identified more transfers now fall outside the adjusted measure. The refresh also added heuristics for short-term routing and changed how organic and payment activity is identified. Visa has not published comparable before-and-after dollar totals or payment-category data, and CryptoSlate notes that Visa's live transaction methodology still describes over 3 million labeled addresses, a figure that does not match the roughly 600 million in the dated changelog's full identity set. Only one outlet has covered the story, so these figures come from CryptoSlate's reading of Visa's own published materials.
How the story developed
- Update
Visa publishes September 18 stablecoin data refresh lowering adjusted volume
Changelog credits a fuller address-label set and revised filters, including new short-term routing heuristics and changes to how organic and payment activity is identified.
- First report
First report by CryptoSlate
Visa cuts reported stablecoin volume but there’s no proof payments fell
- Update
CryptoSlate reports the refresh and the absence of comparable payment data
The outlet reports adjusted volume fell, the transaction count moved by under 2%, and payment trends and chain rankings remain unresolved.
Affected entities
Original sources
| Publisher | Report | Role | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CryptoSlate Crypto media | Visa cuts reported stablecoin volume but there’s no proof payments fell | Original |