HyperliquidHYPE, coin
StableRegulation

Hyperliquid confirms Singapore headquarters as MAS says the platform falls outside its jurisdiction

Hyperliquid Labs confirmed its Singapore base and lack of a MAS license, while the Monetary Authority of Singapore, per the FT, regards the decentralized platform as outside its jurisdiction.

Why it matters

The case shows a gap between where a decentralized platform has a corporate office and which regulator claims oversight of it. Investors in Singapore have a MAS alert listing but no MAS-supervised venue for the product.

Key facts

Hyperliquid Labs confirmed to the FT that it is based in Singapore, and company documents list Singapore as its registered headquarters.

Reported by TheNewsCrypto

MAS told the FT it is not aware that Hyperliquid is regulated in any major jurisdiction.

Reported by Crypto.News

People familiar with MAS's thinking told the FT the regulator considers the decentralized platform outside its jurisdiction and not based in Singapore.

Reported by The Defiant

Hyperliquid said it is not, and has never claimed to be, licensed or authorized by MAS.

Reported by TheNewsCrypto

MAS added Hyperliquid to its Investor Alert List on June 26 without imposing a ban.

Reported by Crypto.News

What happened

The Financial Times reported on October 7 that Hyperliquid Labs confirmed it is based in Singapore, with company documents listing the city-state as its registered headquarters. MAS told the FT it is not aware of Hyperliquid being regulated in any major jurisdiction. The Defiant, Crypto.News and CryptoPotato relayed the FT's account that people familiar with MAS's thinking said the regulator does not consider the platform to be based in Singapore because it is decentralized. Hyperliquid said it is unregulated and has never claimed MAS licensing or authorization, and said it is willing to work constructively with regulators. Crypto.News added that MAS put Hyperliquid on its Investor Alert List on June 26 without a ban. The view on jurisdiction comes from unnamed people, not an on-record MAS statement.

How the story developed

  1. First report

    First report by TheNewsCrypto

    Hyperliquid and MAS Clash Over Singapore’s Regulatory Reach

    TheNewsCrypto

  2. Update

    FT reports Hyperliquid confirms Singapore base and MAS says it is unaware of regulation

    Reported by outlets on October 7.

    TheNewsCrypto

  3. Independent corroboration

    Independently corroborated by The Defiant

    Hyperliquid Confirms Singapore Base but Says It Has No MAS License

    The Defiant

  4. Official statement

    MAS adds Hyperliquid to Investor Alert List

    No ban imposed.

    Crypto.News

  5. Official statement

    Hyperliquid states it has never claimed MAS license or authorization

    Crypto.News

How coverage built up

Independent sources over time, counted the way the consensus panel counts them: a republication of a wire story does not move the line.

7 Oct, 07:175 independent sources7 Oct, 21:55
  • 7 Oct 2026, 07:17 UTC: TheNewsCrypto — 1 independent source, 1 reports
  • 7 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC: Crypto News (CryptoNews.net) — 2 independent sources, 2 reports
  • 7 Oct 2026, 16:42 UTC: The Defiant — 3 independent sources, 3 reports
  • 7 Oct 2026, 20:00 UTC: Crypto.News — 4 independent sources, 4 reports
  • 7 Oct 2026, 21:55 UTC: CryptoPotato — 5 independent sources, 5 reports

Affected entities

Also mentioned: Hong Kong, Bitcoin, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Robinhood

Original sources

PublisherReportRolePublished
TheNewsCrypto
Crypto media
Hyperliquid and MAS Clash Over Singapore’s Regulatory ReachOriginal
The Defiant
Crypto media
Hyperliquid Confirms Singapore Base but Says It Has No MAS LicenseIndependent
Crypto.News
Crypto media
Hyperliquid confirms Singapore base as MAS says it falls outside its remitIndependent
CryptoPotato
Crypto media
Hyperliquid Faces Singapore Regulatory Questions Despite Local HQ: ReportIndependent
Crypto News (CryptoNews.net)
Aggregator
Monetary Authority of Singapore Questions Hyperliquid’sSyndicated