BitcoinBTC, coin
DisputedSecurity

Coinbase designs post-quantum safeguards for about $250 billion in institutional assets

Cryptography head Yehuda Lindell says Coinbase is designing post-quantum safeguards for about $250 billion in institutional assets across several possible signature schemes.

Read this event in español, français

Why it matters

Coinbase says the work is intended to keep its institutional custody platform usable across several post-quantum signature choices rather than one candidate. Crypto.News reports that Bitcoin has not selected or activated such a standard; Lindell says Coinbase is preparing before a cryptographically relevant quantum computer threatens Bitcoin.

Where the sources disagree

Scope of the roughly $250 billion in Coinbase custody

Institutional assets held for BlackRock and other clients

Decrypt, CoinGape, Unchained

BlackRock's roughly $250 billion in crypto assets

Bitcoin Insider

Decrypt and CoinGape describe institutional assets held for BlackRock and other clients, while Bitcoin Insider's headline calls the full roughly $250 billion BlackRock's; Bitcoin Insider's body does not resolve the difference.

What Lindell flagged about multi-party computation

Some post-quantum schemes may be non-MPC-friendly or may not work with MPC

Decrypt, Unchained, Crypto.News

Hash-based signatures are incompatible with MPC

CoinGape

MPC setups may not hold up against future quantum attacks

Bitcoin Insider

Decrypt and Crypto.News say some post-quantum schemes may be unsuitable for MPC, and CoinGape calls hash-based signatures incompatible. Bitcoin Insider instead describes Lindell as warning that MPC may not withstand future quantum attacks.

Description of the programmable-HSM fallback

Post-quantum threshold decryption combined with programmable HSMs

Decrypt

Programmable HSMs assembling keys inside hardened data centres

CoinGape

Decrypt says the fallback combines post-quantum threshold decryption with programmable HSMs, while CoinGape says the HSMs assemble keys inside hardened data centres. The evidence does not show whether CoinGape describes an additional step or a different design.

Key facts

Coinbase is developing post-quantum custody safeguards that can support several possible signature schemes.

Reported by Decrypt

Coinbase says it safeguards roughly $250 billion in institutional assets for clients including BlackRock and others.

250,000,000,000 USDDisputed figureReported by Decrypt

Yehuda Lindell said Coinbase must prepare for different post-quantum signature choices across blockchains because one scheme is unlikely to be adopted everywhere.

Reported by Decrypt

Multi-party computation splits private-key control among parties, but some post-quantum schemes may not work with it; CoinGape specifically describes hash-based signatures as incompatible.

Disputed figureReported by Decrypt

Coinbase is exploring programmable hardware security modules as a fallback for post-quantum key protection.

Reported by Decrypt

Decrypt says the fallback combines post-quantum threshold decryption with programmable HSMs, while CoinGape says the HSMs assemble keys inside hardened data centres.

Disputed figureReported by Decrypt

Crypto.News reported that Bitcoin developers have not selected or activated a practical post-quantum signature standard.

Reported by Crypto.News

Lindell said Coinbase wants safeguards ready if a cryptographically relevant quantum computer eventually becomes an active threat to Bitcoin's security.

Reported by Decrypt

What happened

Decrypt reported that Coinbase is designing post-quantum custody safeguards for roughly $250 billion in institutional assets held for institutions including BlackRock. In a MARA Foundation TV interview reported by Decrypt, Lindell told host Isabel Foxen Duke that Coinbase needs to handle different post-quantum signature choices across blockchains because one scheme is unlikely to be adopted everywhere. Decrypt and Crypto.News said some post-quantum schemes may not work with the multi-party computation (MPC) systems that split private-key control among parties; CoinGape described hash-based signatures as incompatible with MPC. Decrypt said Coinbase is exploring a fallback that combines post-quantum threshold decryption with programmable hardware security modules (HSMs). CoinGape said the HSM fallback assembles keys inside hardened data centres, while Crypto.News described programmable HSMs as an alternative key-protection method. Crypto.News reported that Bitcoin developers have not selected or activated a practical post-quantum signature standard, while Decrypt reported Lindell saying Coinbase is preparing for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer eventually becoming an active threat to Bitcoin; he gave no date.

How the story developed

  1. First report

    First report by Decrypt

    Inside Coinbase’s $250 Billion Playbook for Post-Quantum Bitcoin Custody

    Decrypt

  2. Update

    Coinbase details multi-scheme post-quantum custody plan

    Decrypt reported that Coinbase was developing post-quantum custody safeguards for multiple possible signature schemes and roughly $250 billion in institutional assets.

    Decrypt

  3. Official statement

    Lindell discusses readiness for a future quantum threat

    On MARA Foundation TV, Coinbase cryptography head Yehuda Lindell said the company needed to prepare for different post-quantum signature choices across blockchains and for a possible future quantum threat.

    Decrypt

  4. Independent corroboration

    Independently corroborated by CoinGape

    Coinbase Preps Post-Quantum Custody for $250B Held for BlackRock After Lindell Flags MPC Blind Spot

    CoinGape

How coverage built up

Independent sources over time, counted the way the consensus panel counts them: a republication of a wire story does not move the line.

22 Sept, 20:014 independent sources24 Sept, 00:28
  • 22 Sept 2026, 20:01 UTC: Decrypt — 1 independent source, 1 reports
  • 23 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC: CoinGape — 2 independent sources, 2 reports
  • 23 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC: Crypto.News — 3 independent sources, 4 reports
  • 24 Sept 2026, 00:28 UTC: Bitcoin Insider — 4 independent sources, 5 reports

Affected entities

Also mentioned: Ethereum, Fidelity, XRP, ARK Invest, EigenLayer, El Salvador

Original sources