Indiacountry
DisputedHack

CoinDCX denies new hack claims after $16M in suspicious wallet transfers flagged

CoinDCX disputes allegations of a fresh $16M breach, attributing flagged transfers to wallets compromised in a July 2025 hack, while investigator ZachXBT says at least one address remained active months later.

Why it matters

The dispute highlights ongoing challenges in verifying exchange wallet security and the difficulty users face when on-chain data conflicts with exchange statements. Resolution could affect trust in India's largest crypto exchange and set precedent for how historical wallet compromises are disclosed.

Where the sources disagree

Whether compromised wallet addresses remained active after July 2025 hack

Addresses have not been used by CoinDCX since July 2025 compromise

Crypto.News, Cointelegraph, TheNewsCrypto, CoinDesk

At least one address remained active and interacted with current hot wallet 10 months after breach

Crypto.News, Cointelegraph, CoinDesk

CoinDCX says the addresses have not been used since the July 2025 breach, while ZachXBT says at least one address continued receiving deposits and interacting with current hot wallets for months afterward.

Figures that do not reconcile

Found by comparing the numbers in the reports automatically. They are differences, not yet confirmed to be about the same thing.

amount taken

$16 million

Crypto.News

$44 million

Cointelegraph

Crypto.News reports $16 million, Cointelegraph reports $44 million (64% apart).

amount taken

$16 million

Bitcoin Insider

$44 million

Cointelegraph

Bitcoin Insider reports $16 million, Cointelegraph reports $44 million (64% apart).

amount taken (flagged)

$44 million

Cointelegraph

$16 million

TheNewsCrypto

Cointelegraph reports $44 million, TheNewsCrypto reports $16 million (64% apart).

amount taken (retired wallets)

$44 million

Crypto.News

$16 Million

Bitcoin Insider

Crypto.News reports $44 million, Bitcoin Insider reports $16 Million (64% apart).

Key facts

Blockchain investigators flagged approximately $16 million in suspicious transfers from wallet addresses linked to CoinDCX on October 21, 2026.

16,000,000 USDDisputed figureReported by Crypto.News

CoinDCX denied a new security breach and said the flagged wallet addresses were compromised in the July 2025 hack and have not been used by the exchange since.

Disputed figureReported by Crypto.News

ZachXBT claimed at least one compromised deposit address continued handling deposits and interacting with CoinDCX's current hot wallet for months after the July 2025 breach.

Disputed figureReported by Crypto.News

CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta said the exchange is investigating the claims and assured no user funds will be lost.

Reported by Crypto.News

CoinDCX acknowledged a temporary failure in its process for moving deposits from retired addresses caused operational losses that the exchange absorbed after crediting affected users.

Reported by CoinDesk

CoinDCX suffered a $44 million hack in July 2025.

44,000,000 USDDisputed figureReported by Cointelegraph

Darcy of FlashRescue flagged about $16 million in transfers from addresses labeled as belonging to CoinDCX and claimed two addresses in CoinDCX's latest proof of reserves transferred funds to the flagged Tron address.

16,000,000 USDDisputed figureReported by Cointelegraph

The flagged transactions involved approximately 15.99 million USDT and 5,783.81 TRX.

15,990,000 USDReported by TheNewsCrypto

What happened

Indian exchange CoinDCX denied a new security breach after blockchain investigators flagged approximately $16 million in USDT and TRX transfers from wallet addresses linked to the platform. CoinDCX stated the addresses were created in January 2025, compromised during its July 2025 hack, and have not been used since. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT challenged this account, asserting that at least one deposit address continued receiving user deposits and interacting with CoinDCX's current hot wallet for months after the 2025 incident. CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta acknowledged the claims and said the exchange is investigating, assuring no user funds will be lost. The exchange also acknowledged a temporary process failure in moving deposits from retired addresses that caused operational losses it absorbed. The July 2025 breach had drained $44 million from CoinDCX.

How the story developed

  1. Update

    Blockchain investigators flag $16M in suspicious transfers from CoinDCX-linked wallets

    Darcy and ZachXBT identify approximately $16M in USDT and TRX transfers from addresses labeled as CoinDCX wallets

    Crypto.News

  2. First report

    First report by Crypto.News

    CoinDCX denies second hack claims as ZachXBT questions wallet activity

    Crypto.News

  3. Official statement

    CoinDCX issues statement denying new breach

    Exchange says flagged wallets were compromised in July 2025 hack and have not been used since

    Crypto.News

  4. Update

    ZachXBT challenges CoinDCX explanation

    Investigator claims at least one compromised address continued handling deposits and interacting with current hot wallet months after 2025 breach

    Crypto.News

  5. Independent corroboration

    Independently corroborated by Cointelegraph

    CoinDCX pledges no user losses after $16M transfers draw scrutiny

    Cointelegraph

  6. Update

    CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta responds to ZachXBT

    Gupta acknowledges claims and says exchange is investigating further, assures no user funds will be lost

    Cointelegraph

  7. Update

    CoinDesk reports CoinDCX acknowledges operational losses from retired address process failure

    Exchange confirms temporary failure in moving deposits from retired addresses caused losses it absorbed

    CoinDesk

How coverage built up

Independent sources over time, counted the way the consensus panel counts them: a republication of a wire story does not move the line.

22 Oct, 09:276 independent sources25 Oct, 19:02
  • 22 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC: Crypto.News — 1 independent source, 1 reports
  • 22 Oct 2026, 09:29 UTC: Bitcoin Insider — 2 independent sources, 2 reports
  • 22 Oct 2026, 10:53 UTC: Cointelegraph — 3 independent sources, 3 reports
  • 22 Oct 2026, 11:54 UTC: TheNewsCrypto — 4 independent sources, 4 reports
  • 23 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC: CoinDesk — 5 independent sources, 5 reports
  • 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC: CryptoPotato — 6 independent sources, 8 reports

Affected entities

Also mentioned: Base, Cardano, Chainlink

Original sources