USD CoinUSDC, token
StableStablecoin

BIS working paper finds higher bank deposit rates slow stablecoin growth, with USDC more affected than USDT

A BIS working paper found that a 1 basis point rise in U.S. bank deposit rates cut 10-week stablecoin growth from 15% to 12%, with stronger effects for USDC than USDT.

Why it matters

The research provides empirical evidence that banks retain influence over stablecoin adoption through deposit pricing, suggesting stablecoins and bank deposits function as substitutes for some users. This has implications for how regulators and central banks assess stablecoin competition with traditional banking.

Key facts

A BIS working paper published October 13 studied weekly U.S. data from January 2019 to June 2025 covering 339 weeks

Reported by CoinDesk

Average 10-week stablecoin growth was about 15% in the sample

15 %Reported by CoinDesk

A 1 basis point rise in bank deposit rates cut 10-week stablecoin growth to about 12% under the baseline estimate

12 %Reported by CoinDesk

An instrumental-variable estimate showed a larger effect, slowing 10-week growth to about 6%

6 %Reported by CoinDesk

Similar substitution patterns appeared for certificates of deposit and stablecoins supplied to decentralized lending platforms

Reported by Crypto.News

The authors cautioned the sample covers only one high-rate period and findings do not establish definitive causality

Reported by CoinDesk

What happened

Bank for International Settlements economists Rashad Ahmed and Iñaki Aldasoro published a working paper on October 13 examining weekly U.S. data from January 2019 through June 2025. They found that a one-basis-point increase in average bank deposit rates predicted slower stablecoin market capitalization growth. Under the baseline estimate, 10-week growth fell from about 15% to 12%. An instrumental-variable method designed to isolate causality produced a larger effect, slowing growth to roughly 6%. The substitution effect was stronger for Circle's USDC than for Tether's USDT, which the authors linked to USDC's closer ties to U.S. users. Similar patterns appeared for certificates of deposit and stablecoins supplied to decentralized lending platforms. The authors cautioned that the sample covers only one high-rate period and that their views do not represent official BIS policy.

How the story developed

  1. Update

    BIS working paper published

    Working paper 'Are Stablecoins and Bank Deposits Substitutes?' by Rashad Ahmed and Iñaki Aldasoro published on October 13

    CoinDesk

  2. First report

    First report by CoinDesk

    Banks could slow stablecoin growth by paying savers more, BIS paper finds

    CoinDesk

  3. Independent corroboration

    Independently corroborated by Crypto.News

    BIS: Bank rate hikes cut stablecoin growth by 3 points

    Crypto.News

  4. Update

    Crypto.News and Decrypt publish independent coverage

    Both outlets report on the paper with specific figures for USDC vs USDT differential

    Crypto.News

  5. Update

    Unchained publishes detailed analysis

    Unchained reports additional context including the $5B to $220B market cap growth and the 'first empirical evidence' claim

    Unchained

How coverage built up

Independent sources over time, counted the way the consensus panel counts them: a republication of a wire story does not move the line.

17 Oct, 12:005 independent sources19 Oct, 09:51
  • 17 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTC: CoinDesk — 1 independent source, 1 reports
  • 17 Oct 2026, 12:14 UTC: Bitcoin Insider — 2 independent sources, 2 reports
  • 18 Oct 2026, 12:46 UTC: Crypto.News — 3 independent sources, 4 reports
  • 18 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC: Decrypt — 4 independent sources, 5 reports
  • 19 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTC: Unchained — 5 independent sources, 7 reports

Affected entities

Also mentioned: Federal Reserve, Donald Trump, Base, Chainlink

Original sources